Reviewed by PeptideGuide Research TeamLast updated February 15, 2026

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before using any peptide.Read full disclaimer

Back to Comparisons

Angiotensin 1-7 vs Angiotensin II

Complete side-by-side comparison of Angiotensin 1-7 and Angiotensin II.

Comparative Analysis

Angiotensin 1-7 and Angiotensin II represent two opposing forces within the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), functioning as biological counterbalances that regulate cardiovascular homeostasis through fundamentally different mechanisms. While both peptides originate from the same angiotensinogen precursor, their physiological effects create a delicate equilibrium essential for maintaining optimal blood pressure and cardiovascular health. Angiotensin II, the classical effector of the RAS, operates through AT1 receptors to promote vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, and sodium retention. This peptide increases peripheral vascular resistance, enhances cardiac contractility, and stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, collectively elevating blood pressure. Its actions extend beyond cardiovascular regulation to include cellular proliferation, inflammation promotion, and oxidative stress induction. These effects make Angiotensin II a primary target for hypertension management through ACE inhibitors and ARBs. In contrast, Angiotensin 1-7 functions as the protective arm of the RAS, primarily acting through the Mas receptor to produce vasodilation, anti-inflammatory effects, and cardioprotection. This heptapeptide promotes nitric oxide release, enhances endothelial function, and exhibits anti-fibrotic properties. Its actions directly oppose those of Angiotensin II, creating a counter-regulatory mechanism that prevents excessive vasoconstriction and tissue damage. The enzymatic pathways generating these peptides differ significantly. Angiotensin II formation relies heavily on ACE conversion from Angiotensin I, while Angiotensin 1-7 can be produced through multiple routes, including direct ACE2-mediated conversion from Angiotensin II or alternative pathways from Angiotensin I. This diversity in formation pathways suggests evolutionary importance in maintaining cardiovascular balance. Receptor selectivity distinguishes these peptides functionally. Angiotensin II's high affinity for AT1 receptors triggers rapid vasoconstriction and aldosterone release, while its interaction with AT2 receptors may produce opposing effects. Angiotensin 1-7's selective binding to Mas receptors consistently produces protective cardiovascular effects, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced cardiac remodeling. Clinical implications reveal their therapeutic potential in opposite directions. While Angiotensin II analogs might benefit patients with severe hypotension or distributive shock, Angiotensin 1-7 shows promise for treating hypertension, heart failure, and metabolic disorders. Research indicates that Angiotensin 1-7 may protect against diabetic complications, reduce cardiac fibrosis, and improve endothelial dysfunction. The balance between these peptides appears crucial for cardiovascular health. Conditions favoring Angiotensin II dominance contribute to hypertension, atherosclerosis, and cardiac remodeling, while enhanced Angiotensin 1-7 activity provides cardiovascular protection. Understanding this balance has led to therapeutic strategies aimed at shifting the equilibrium toward the protective Angiotensin 1-7/Mas axis while reducing harmful Angiotensin II/AT1 receptor activation.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Property
Angiotensin 1-7
Angiotensin II
Name
Angiotensin 1-7
Angiotensin II
Peptide Class
Neuropeptide
Oligopeptide
Category
Neuropeptide
Neuropeptide
Dosage Range
N/A
1-10 micrograms per hour (IV infusion)
Half-Life
10-30 minutes
15-30 minutes
FDA Status
Not Approved
Approved
Safety Rating
Research Only
Prescription Required
Cost Estimate
N/A
$200-500 per cycle

Key Differences

  • 1

    Angiotensin 1-7 produces vasodilation and blood pressure reduction through Mas receptor activation, while Angiotensin II causes vasoconstriction and hypertension via AT1 receptor binding, creating opposite cardiovascular effects that represent the protective versus harmful arms of the renin-angiotensin system.

  • 2

    Angiotensin II promotes inflammation, oxidative stress, and tissue fibrosis contributing to cardiovascular disease progression, whereas Angiotensin 1-7 exhibits anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-fibrotic properties that protect against cardiovascular damage and support tissue repair mechanisms.

  • 3

    The enzymatic formation pathways differ significantly, with Angiotensin II primarily generated through ACE-mediated conversion, while Angiotensin 1-7 can be produced through multiple routes including ACE2-mediated breakdown of Angiotensin II, representing a natural counter-regulatory mechanism.

  • 4

    Therapeutic applications are essentially opposite, with Angiotensin II potentially useful only in severe hypotensive emergencies, while Angiotensin 1-7 shows promise for treating hypertension, heart failure, diabetes complications, and providing general cardiovascular protection through its beneficial metabolic and vascular effects.

Which Should You Choose?

The choice between these peptides depends entirely on therapeutic objectives and clinical context. Angiotensin II should be considered only in specific clinical scenarios requiring immediate vasoconstriction, such as distributive shock or severe hypotension unresponsive to conventional vasopressors. Its potent hypertensive effects make it unsuitable for most cardiovascular conditions. Angiotensin 1-7 represents the more promising therapeutic option for most applications, particularly cardiovascular protection, hypertension management, and metabolic disorders. Its vasodilatory, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective properties align with treating rather than causing cardiovascular disease. For individuals seeking cardiovascular health optimization, metabolic improvement, or protection against hypertensive complications, Angiotensin 1-7's beneficial profile makes it the logical choice. However, both peptides require careful medical supervision due to their potent cardiovascular effects and potential for significant blood pressure alterations.