Reviewed by PeptideGuide Research TeamLast updated February 15, 2026

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before using any peptide.Read full disclaimer

Back to Comparisons

Angiotensin 1-7 vs Bradykinin

Complete side-by-side comparison of Angiotensin 1-7 and Bradykinin.

Comparative Analysis

Angiotensin 1-7 and Bradykinin represent two distinct yet complementary vasodilatory peptides that operate through different mechanisms within the cardiovascular system. Both peptides serve as important counter-regulatory molecules that promote vasodilation and cardiovascular protection, but their origins, receptor interactions, and physiological roles differ significantly. Angiotensin 1-7 functions as a protective arm of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), acting as a direct counterbalance to the vasoconstrictor effects of Angiotensin II. This heptapeptide primarily exerts its effects through the Mas receptor, promoting vasodilation, anti-inflammatory responses, and cardioprotective mechanisms. Its role extends beyond simple blood pressure regulation to include tissue protection, anti-fibrotic effects, and metabolic benefits. Angiotensin 1-7 demonstrates particular efficacy in protecting against cardiovascular remodeling and maintaining endothelial function under pathological conditions. Bradykinin operates through a different pathway, binding to B1 and B2 receptors to induce rapid vasodilation and increase vascular permeability. This nonapeptide is generated through the kallikrein-kinin system and serves as a potent mediator of acute vascular responses. Bradykinin's effects are typically more immediate and pronounced, making it particularly important in inflammatory responses and acute cardiovascular events. Its ability to increase vascular permeability also plays crucial roles in tissue repair and immune cell trafficking. The temporal dynamics of these peptides differ markedly. Angiotensin 1-7 tends to provide more sustained, long-term cardiovascular protection through chronic receptor activation and gene expression changes. Its effects build gradually and contribute to overall cardiovascular homeostasis. Bradykinin, conversely, produces rapid, short-lived responses that are essential for immediate vascular adjustments and inflammatory processes. Both peptides demonstrate neuroprotective properties, but through different mechanisms. Angiotensin 1-7's neuroprotection stems from its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects, while Bradykinin's neuroprotective role involves enhancing cerebral blood flow and promoting neuroplasticity through increased vascular permeability and growth factor release. In terms of therapeutic applications, Angiotensin 1-7 shows promise for chronic cardiovascular conditions, metabolic disorders, and long-term organ protection. Bradykinin-related therapies focus more on acute interventions, pain management, and inflammatory conditions. The degradation pathways also differ, with Angiotensin 1-7 being metabolized by ACE2 and other peptidases, while Bradykinin is rapidly degraded by ACE and other kininases, contributing to its shorter half-life and more transient effects.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Property
Angiotensin 1-7
Bradykinin
Name
Angiotensin 1-7
Bradykinin
Peptide Class
Neuropeptide
Neuropeptide
Category
Neuropeptide
Neuropeptide
Dosage Range
N/A
N/A
Half-Life
10-30 minutes
15-30 seconds
FDA Status
Not Approved
Not Approved
Safety Rating
Research Only
Research Only
Cost Estimate
N/A
N/A

Key Differences

  • 1

    Angiotensin 1-7 operates through the Mas receptor pathway as part of the protective RAS axis, while Bradykinin functions via B1 and B2 receptors in the kallikrein-kinin system, representing fundamentally different signaling cascades with distinct downstream effects and regulatory mechanisms.

  • 2

    The temporal profiles differ significantly, with Angiotensin 1-7 providing sustained, long-term cardiovascular protection through gradual receptor activation, while Bradykinin produces rapid, intense but short-lived vascular responses ideal for acute physiological adjustments.

  • 3

    Vascular permeability effects vary considerably between the peptides, as Bradykinin dramatically increases vascular permeability for immune cell trafficking and tissue repair, whereas Angiotensin 1-7 maintains vascular integrity while promoting protective vasodilation.

  • 4

    Their roles in inflammation show opposite characteristics: Angiotensin 1-7 primarily exhibits anti-inflammatory properties that reduce tissue damage, while Bradykinin can promote inflammatory responses when needed for tissue repair and immune system activation.

  • 5

    Metabolic effects distinguish these peptides, with Angiotensin 1-7 demonstrating significant metabolic benefits including improved insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism, while Bradykinin's metabolic influence is more limited and indirect through vascular effects.

Which Should You Choose?

The choice between Angiotensin 1-7 and Bradykinin depends on your specific therapeutic goals and timeline requirements. Choose Angiotensin 1-7 if you're seeking long-term cardiovascular protection, chronic disease management, or sustained anti-inflammatory effects. Its gradual, sustained action makes it ideal for conditions requiring ongoing vascular protection and metabolic support. This peptide is particularly valuable for individuals with hypertension, heart failure, or metabolic syndrome who need comprehensive cardiovascular remodeling protection. Select Bradykinin if you require rapid vascular responses, acute inflammatory modulation, or immediate vasodilation effects. Its quick onset and potent vascular permeability effects make it suitable for acute interventions or conditions requiring immediate vascular adjustments. However, consider that Bradykinin's effects are shorter-lived and may require more frequent administration. For optimal results, some therapeutic approaches may benefit from understanding how these peptides work synergistically, as they can complement each other's effects in comprehensive cardiovascular protection strategies.