Reviewed by PeptideGuide Research TeamLast updated February 15, 2026

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before using any peptide.Read full disclaimer

Back to Comparisons

Defensin HNP-1 vs LL-37

Complete side-by-side comparison of Defensin HNP-1 and LL-37.

Comparative Analysis

Defensin HNP-1 and LL-37 represent two distinct classes of antimicrobial peptides that serve as crucial components of the human innate immune system, yet they differ significantly in their mechanisms, origins, and therapeutic applications. Both peptides function as natural antibiotics, but their approaches to microbial defense and immune modulation vary considerably. Defensin HNP-1 belongs to the α-defensin family and is primarily produced by neutrophils and intestinal Paneth cells. This peptide operates through a direct cytotoxic mechanism, forming pores in microbial cell membranes that lead to rapid cell lysis. Its structure features a characteristic β-sheet configuration stabilized by three disulfide bonds, creating a highly stable and potent antimicrobial agent. HNP-1 demonstrates broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, fungi, and some viruses, making it particularly effective in localized infections and wound healing applications. LL-37, derived from the cathelicidin family, represents the only human cathelicidin and is produced by various cell types including neutrophils, epithelial cells, and macrophages. Unlike HNP-1's primarily destructive approach, LL-37 exhibits a more sophisticated dual-action mechanism. While it does disrupt microbial membranes, it simultaneously modulates immune responses by binding to various cellular receptors, including toll-like receptors and formyl peptide receptors. This dual functionality allows LL-37 to not only eliminate pathogens but also orchestrate appropriate immune responses and promote tissue repair. The structural differences between these peptides significantly impact their therapeutic potential. HNP-1's rigid, disulfide-stabilized structure provides exceptional stability but limits its adaptability in different physiological environments. Conversely, LL-37's more flexible α-helical structure allows for conformational changes that enable its diverse biological functions, including chemotaxis, angiogenesis, and wound healing promotion. In terms of clinical applications, HNP-1 shows promise in treating antibiotic-resistant infections and as a topical antimicrobial agent. Its potent membrane-disrupting activity makes it particularly valuable against biofilm-forming bacteria. LL-37, with its broader biological activities, demonstrates potential in treating chronic wounds, inflammatory conditions, and as an adjuvant in cancer therapy due to its ability to modulate immune cell behavior and promote tissue regeneration. Both peptides face similar challenges in therapeutic development, including potential cytotoxicity at high concentrations and susceptibility to proteolytic degradation. However, their distinct mechanisms offer complementary approaches to antimicrobial therapy, with HNP-1 providing rapid pathogen elimination and LL-37 offering sustained immune modulation and tissue repair benefits.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Property
Defensin HNP-1
LL-37
Name
Defensin HNP-1
LL-37
Peptide Class
Alpha-defensin
Antimicrobial peptide
Category
Antimicrobial
Immune Support
Dosage Range
N/A
Varies based on application
Half-Life
N/A
Short, minutes to hours
FDA Status
Not Approved
Not approved
Safety Rating
Research Only
Generally Well-Tolerated
Cost Estimate
N/A
N/A

Key Differences

  • 1

    HNP-1 operates through direct membrane pore formation leading to rapid microbial lysis, while LL-37 combines membrane disruption with sophisticated immune modulation through receptor binding, offering both antimicrobial and immunoregulatory functions in a single peptide.

  • 2

    Structural stability differs significantly between the peptides, with HNP-1's rigid β-sheet structure stabilized by three disulfide bonds providing exceptional stability but limited flexibility, whereas LL-37's α-helical structure allows conformational adaptability enabling diverse biological interactions.

  • 3

    Cellular origin and distribution vary considerably, as HNP-1 is primarily produced by neutrophils and intestinal Paneth cells for localized defense, while LL-37 is synthesized by multiple cell types including epithelial cells and macrophages, providing broader systemic antimicrobial coverage.

  • 4

    Therapeutic applications diverge based on their mechanisms, with HNP-1 showing particular promise against antibiotic-resistant bacteria and biofilm infections requiring rapid pathogen elimination, while LL-37 excels in chronic wound healing and inflammatory conditions requiring sustained immune modulation.

  • 5

    Biological activity spectrum differs substantially, as HNP-1 focuses primarily on direct antimicrobial action with some immune modulatory effects, whereas LL-37 demonstrates multifunctional properties including chemotaxis, angiogenesis promotion, and tissue repair alongside its antimicrobial capabilities.

Which Should You Choose?

The choice between Defensin HNP-1 and LL-37 depends on your specific therapeutic objectives and clinical context. Choose HNP-1 if you need rapid, potent antimicrobial action against resistant pathogens or biofilm infections. Its direct membrane-disrupting mechanism makes it ideal for acute infections requiring immediate pathogen elimination, particularly in topical applications or localized treatments. Select LL-37 for more complex therapeutic scenarios requiring immune modulation alongside antimicrobial activity. Its multifunctional properties make it superior for chronic wound healing, inflammatory conditions, or situations where tissue repair and immune system coordination are equally important as pathogen control. LL-37's ability to promote angiogenesis and modulate inflammatory responses provides additional therapeutic value beyond simple antimicrobial action. For research applications, HNP-1 offers a more straightforward model for studying direct antimicrobial mechanisms, while LL-37 provides insights into complex host-pathogen interactions and immune system modulation. Consider combination approaches where both peptides' complementary mechanisms could provide synergistic benefits in treating complex infections or promoting comprehensive tissue healing.